Do economists need to read Marx and Smith?

Humanities scholars on X have a hissy fit about economists' purported illiteracy.

Do economists need to read Marx and Smith?

1. Introduction

  • Briefly mention the diversity of economic debates and opinions found in recent tweets.
  • Highlight the range of topics—from H1B immigration and housing shortages to academic controversies about economists’ reading habits.

2. Immigration and H1B

High-Skill Immigration

  • Tweets by @erikbryn and @lugaricano discuss pros and cons of high-skill immigration, referencing growth, innovation, and the net fiscal contribution debate.
  • @cesifoti shares a personal account of how the H1B transformed his career trajectory.

Impacts on Labor Markets

  • @jmwooldridge points out the seemingly contradictory calls to allow more skilled immigrants but restrict certain low-skilled sectors.
  • @florianederer and @florianederer highlight how H1B concentration affects wages and job allocations in tech.

Daron Acemoglu’s Angle on H1B

  • @DAcemogluMIT examines how immigration inflows might shape the direction of technological change.

3. The Debate: Are Economists Reading Enough Marx, Smith, & More?

Academic Illiteracy Allegations

  • Some tweets decry that many economists skip essential texts from Marx or Smith.
  • @VincentGeloso argues Marx is overrated historically, while @profdavidharvey tweets are steeped in Marxist commentary.
  • @wwwojtekk notes criticisms of economists for ignoring foundational thinkers.

Why It Matters

  • The question of reading foundational works ties back to how economists form policy views.
  • This sparks a meta-discussion on whether skipping deep theory leads to flawed modern analysis.

4. Spotlight on Daron Acemoglu

Tech Sector Critiques

  • @DAcemogluMIT has multiple threads discussing the direction of technology, “remaking” Silicon Valley, and how skilled immigration might affect innovation.

Endogenous Technology & Policy

  • Acemoglu cautions about large platforms dominating, encourages more competitive or worker-friendly innovation.
  • References to fairness in the data economy (#acemoglu).

5. Tech, Housing, and Market Debates

Permissionless Innovation vs. Investment

  • @hamandcheese suggests US capital markets, not just “tech freedom,” drive unicorn creation.

Housing Shortages and Congestion Pricing

  • @arpitrage questions the term “housing shortage.”
  • @arpitrage sees positive outcomes from pricing policies in crowded cities.

Innovation Economics

  • @elidourado notes that ideas are easy to conceive but difficult to execute effectively.

6. Hot Takes

A selection of strong or provocative opinions that don’t always fit neatly elsewhere:


7. Academic Life & Controversies

Econometrics & Teaching Resources

Workplace Harassment & Gender Issues

  • @jenniferdoleac tweets about sexual harassment in academia and negative impacts on women’s careers.

Debates Over Reading & Translation

  • @paulnovosad suggests modernizing older texts, referencing the accessibility of literary classics.

8. Conclusion

  • Summarize how these tweets illustrate ongoing clashes and evolutions in economics—ranging from immigration policies and the future of tech to internal academic debates.
  • Emphasize the continued importance of thoughtful discourse and engagement with both foundational texts and cutting-edge research.

Get the newsletter in your inbox each week